Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!att!ucbvax!janus!mitchell
From: mitchell@janus.uucp (Evan Mitchell)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Re: Amiga vs. Atari ST
Message-ID: <30254@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU>
Date: 28 Jul 89 15:43:19 GMT
References: <89072707200427@masnet.uucp>
Sender: usenet@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Reply-To: mitchell@janus.UUCP (Evan Mitchell)
Organization: University of California, Berkeley
Lines: 22

In article <89072707200427@masnet.uucp> david.megginson@canremote.uucp (DAVID MEGGINSON) writes:
>I suggest that you look at the software as well as the computer itself.  
>Consider Calamus and DynaCadd on the ST, and compare them to whatever is 
>available on the Amiga.
>---
> * Via ProDoor 3.0R 
This is true.  However, consider Professional Page (full Postscript color
seperations (4096 soon to be 16 mil)) and X-Cad.  And remember you can run
both of them at the same time, and you can add an '030 to your system (A2000
without hacking) and a math co-processor (68882) and lots of good NTSC
compatible video software available, and...

Don't kid yourself, this isn't an easy choice.  I chose to go with the company
with the least amount of vaporware...

-Evan
_______________________________________________________________________________
|  Evan Jay Mitchell                 EECS/ERL Industrial Liaison Program      |
|  mitchell@janus.berkeley.edu       University of California at Berkeley     |
|  Phone: (415) 643-6687                                                      |
|           "Think, it ain't illegal...yet!" - George Clinton                 |
|_____________________________________________________________________________|