Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!att!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!ulowell!hawk!boneill
From: boneill@hawk.ulowell.edu (Brian O'Neill - SoftXc)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.encore
Subject: Re: Things I miss....
Message-ID: <14484@swan.ulowell.edu>
Date: 7 Aug 89 19:15:21 GMT
References: <8908031737.AA08682@skeeve.mcs.anl.gov> <12006@xenna.Encore.COM> <1000@accuvax.nwu.edu>
Sender: news@swan.ulowell.edu
Reply-To: boneill@hawk.ulowell.edu (Brian O'Neill - SoftXc)
Organization: University of Lowell, CS Dept.
Lines: 16

In article <1000@accuvax.nwu.edu> phil@delta.eecs.nwu.edu (Bill LeFebvre) writes:
>
>Yeah, but will the nlist labels be the same?!?  :-)
>
>
>		William LeFebvre

Speaking of the nlist labels, does the UMAX 4.2 kernal have an equivalent to
BSD's avenrun, for finding the load average? In porting X-windows code,
xload is the only program I could not compile, and it needs the load average
variable.

==============================================================================
Brian O'Neill, MS-DOS Software Exchange Coordinator
Internet: boneill@hawk.ulowell.edu 
UUCP: {(backbones),harvard,mit-eddie,et. al.}!ulowell!hawk.ulowell.edu!boneill