Xref: utzoo comp.sys.ibm.pc:32359 comp.dcom.modems:4207
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cica!ctrsol!ginosko!aplcen!wb3ffv!ka3ovk!ki4pv!tanner
From: tanner@ki4pv.uucp (Dr. T. Andrews)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc,comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: Line Noise Killer
Summary: use higher-rated cap for safety
Message-ID: <7113@ki4pv.uucp>
Date: 30 Jul 89 13:06:43 GMT
References: <9086@chinet.chi.il.us>
Followup-To: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Distribution: usa
Organization: Evildrome Boozarama
Lines: 9

The 90VDC cap should be sufficient in normal service.  Remember that
there may occasionally be up to 200VDC of "testing" on the line.  You
may want to be generous in overspecifying here.

I make no remarks about trusting a radio shack 100V cap to be good at
90V for extended service.
-- 
...!bikini.cis.ufl.edu!ki4pv!tanner  ...!bpa!cdin-1!ki4pv!tanner
or...  {allegra attctc gatech!uflorida uunet!cdin-1}!ki4pv!tanner