Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ncar!tank!ra_robert@gsbacd.uchicago.edu
From: ra_robert@gsbacd.uchicago.edu
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: Apple vs. Microsoft: Press Release & commentary
Message-ID: <4729@tank.uchicago.edu>
Date: 29 Jul 89 19:06:27 GMT
Sender: news@tank.uchicago.edu
Distribution: na
Organization: University of Chicago Graduate School of Business
Lines: 23

In article <30257@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU>, wilson@ucbarpa.Berkeley.EDU (James E. Wilson) writes...
 
>I've seen about 10 opinions on the ruling so far.  Only two have shown it in
>a positive light for Apple:
>1) the Apple press release.
>2) a stock broker specializing in Apple stocks.
>Everyone else, newspaper reporters, legal experts, etc, has used phrases like
>"stunning legal blow for Apple".  A San Francisco Chronicle article about the



For what it's worth, the New York Times article that I read about it didn't
imply that it was a "stunning legal blow for Apple".  In fact, my impression
was that the article/reporter felt that Apple had come out ahead.

I'll keep my opinion to myself, but just thought I'd set the record straight.


Robert
------
ra_robert@gsbacd.uchicago.edu
------
generic disclaimer: all my opinions are mine