Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!lll-winken!uunet!lupine!infopiz!teemc!ka3ovk!wb3ffv!aplcen!unmvax!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cica!iuvax!rutgers!cbmvax!vu-vlsi!swatsun!jackiw
From: jackiw@cs.swarthmore.edu (Nick Jackiw)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.programmer
Subject: Re: ResEdit1.3dDate: 20 Jul 89 20:10:56 GMT
Message-ID: <4784@infopiz.uucp>
Date: 31 Jul 89 05:49:38 GMT
References: <2801@murtoa.cs.mu.oz.au> <239@6sigma.UUCP>
Reply-To: jackiw@carthage.UUCP (Nick Jackiw)
Organization: Visual Geometry Project, Swarthmore College, PA
Lines: 16

In article <239@6sigma.UUCP> blm@6sigma.UUCP (Brian Matthews) writes:
> While we're talking about ResEdit, I have a question for everybody.  How
> many think ResEdit should just use SF{PutFile, GetFile} like everybody
> else?
> I do, and here's why:
[Many good reasons deleted]
> Brian L. Matthews	Six Sigma 
Right on! I'm usually connected to my campus' several massive Vax file
servers by AlisaShare.  Run ResEdit and even on my 20 seconds (_after_ having loaded) to scan all those remote, read-only
volumes and give me their unwanted contents.

On the other hand, it's nice to have a bit of diversity.
-- 
     _  _|\____    Nick Jackiw | Visual Geometry Project | Math Department
   / /_/   O>  \   ------------+-------------------------+ Swarthmore College
   |       O>   |  215-328-8225| jackiw@cs.swarthmore.edu| Swarthmore PA 190    \_Guernica_/   ------------+-------------------------+                 USA