Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!att!pacbell!ames!ncar!tank!shamash!com50!mscunx!hawkmoon!det
From: det@hawkmoon.MN.ORG (Derek E. Terveer)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.microport
Subject: Re: svbinmail for uport 386 3.0xx
Summary: actually, there just might be!
Keywords: smail uport 386 mail mailx
Message-ID: <1076@hawkmoon.MN.ORG>
Date: 23 Jul 89 23:26:21 GMT
References: <418@osc.COM> <8714@attctc.Dallas.TX.US>
Distribution: na
Organization: One of the Eternal Champions - Richfield, MN, 554232523, USA
Lines: 19

In article <8714@attctc.Dallas.TX.US>, wnp@attctc.Dallas.TX.US (Wolf Paul) writes:
> But I cannot for the best of me find anything incompatible with SysVR3
> in svbinmail.c.

As i recall, both for smail(2.5) and for smail(3.1.x), i had to add the -s
option (for specifying subject from the command line) to the getopt() call and
the case statement that follows for it to work correctly on my uPort Sys V
386/3.0e system (as well as att unix, etc).

I believe that was the only incompatibility and really, that was just a bug or
typo (or so i would like to believe, anyway -- although why this well known
omission reappeared in smail(3.1.x) is beyond me)

derek
-- 
Derek Terveer 	    det@hawkmoon.MN.ORG || ..!uunet!rosevax!elric!hawkmoon!det
		    w(612)681-6986   h(612)789-8643

"A proper king is crowned" -- Thomas B. Costain