Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!att!ucbvax!decwrl!sgi!calcite!vjs
From: vjs@calcite.UUCP (Vernon Schryver)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.i386,comp.unix.microport
Subject: make(1)
Keywords: small rinky-dink 286-like grumble
Message-ID: <58@calcite.UUCP>
Date: 6 Aug 89 21:00:31 GMT
Organization: Rhyolite Software, Mountain View, CA
Lines: 13

Am I the only person in the world who thinks that make(1) should be compiled
so that '-d' works?  Does no one else have enough memory or commit obscure
errors that would be illuminated by `make -nd`?  `Make -p` just is not enough
for my mistakes.

I guessed history was a good enough reason make(1) was built small in Microport
3.0e.  Finding the same restriction in ISC 2.0.2 has made me wonder if someone
at AT&T is asleep at the helm.  (Presumably, ISC just uses cmd/make/make.mk
as it comes from New Jersey.)


Vernon Schryver
vjs@calcite.uucp   or   ...{pyramid,sgi}!sgi!calcite!vjs