Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cwjcc!hal!ncoast!fmsystm!macy From: macy@fmsystm.UUCP (Macy Hallock) Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix Subject: Re: Sorry: Micronics & Xenix Summary: works on my 20mhz Message-ID: <21@fmsystm.UUCP> Date: 21 Jul 89 23:29:39 GMT Expires: 14 Aug 89 23:00:00 GMT References: <4486@tank.uchicago.edu> Reply-To: macy@fmsystm.UUCP (Macy Hallock) Distribution: usa Organization: F M Systems Medina, Ohio USA Lines: 33 In article <4486@tank.uchicago.edu> goer@sophist.UUCP (Richard Goerwitz) writes: >Sorry: Has anyone installed Xenix on a system based on a 25 Mhz >Micronics (or other Micronics) motherboard? You bet. I am using 20mhz non-cached Micronics push (16mhz 386 chip) boards and they run just fine. Never tried the caching versoins, but Micronics told me they work OK, too, and I believe them. BTW - I chose non-caching to prevent problems with my multiuser RS-232 boards (I was more conservative 10 mo. ago with 386 stuff than I am now) >I keep trying to get >a hold of SCO for information like this, but it's impossible to >get through, and the salespeople don't return calls in cases of >mundane (but very important to ME) questions. > And they won't either... I think it very unlikely SCO has tried every brand of 386 motherboard on the market. Truly thorough testing is time consuming and expensive... and the manufacturers keep changing things on the boards, too. SCO tests the major brands of assembled systems and leaves the rest to VARS, integrators and manufacturers. SCO has become popular enough that I have talked to several motherboard mfr's who have taken it upon themselves to test their products with SCO Xenix (and DOS and Novell). These are the kind of mfr's I will buy from in the future! Macy Hallock fmsystm!macy@NCoast.ORG F M Systems, Inc. hal!ncoast!fmsystm!macy 150 Highland Dr. uunet!aablue!fmsystm!macy Medina, OH 44256 Voice: 216-723-3000 X251 Disclaimer: My advice is worth what you paid for it. Your milage may vary.