Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ukma!husc6!rice!cathyf From: cathyf@Rice.EDU (Catherine A. Foulston) Newsgroups: news.software.b Subject: B news duplicate articles Summary: Why isn't stuff staying in my history file? Keywords: expire, history, B news, duplicate Message-ID: <413@brazos.Rice.edu> Date: 3 Aug 89 05:45:34 GMT Sender: root@rice.edu Reply-To: cathyf@rice.edu Followup-To: news.software.b Organization: Rice University, Houston, Texas Lines: 32 Help! As many people have observed in news.admin, a bunch of old articles got dumped out on the net. I don't understand why the history mechanism is not causing these articles to be rejected. o I am running B News 2.11 patchlevel 17 and nntp 1.5.5. o I am running expire nightly and rebuilding once a week. Articles are supposed to stay around for 2 weeks or less depending on the newsgroup. History is supposed to be retained for 30 days for ALL articles. At least this is what I think I am doing with expire. Maybe I don't understand it. What options am I supposed to give expire to make it do this? o I recently converted from the old usg-style history to using ndbm. At that time I *completely* rebuilt the history file from scratch. o There are two copies of most of the duplicates in the directory. Doing a diff on them shows that only the path is different. o Only the LATER of the two copies appears in the history file. o Most recently the problem has been with the large batch of old news that everybody got that was dated July 22. But I have had this problem before (even before I converted to ndbm). Maybe I just don't understand how expire or history are supposed to work. If anyone can explain this to me or suggest possible sources of this problem, I would appreciate it greatly. Many thanks in advance. (P.S: I already RTFM--I guess I don't understand it.) regards, cathy :) As usual, email replies are probably better than posts Cathy Foulston =||= cathyf@rice.edu =||= {backbone?}!rice!cathyf Disclaimer: I'm a student--I don't even KNOW Rice University's opinion.