Xref: utzoo rec.audio:14278 sci.electronics:7189
Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cornell!uw-beaver!fluke!strong
From: strong@tc.fluke.COM (Norm Strong)
Newsgroups: rec.audio,sci.electronics
Subject: Re: Cassette Bias Trim
Message-ID: <10033@fluke.COM>
Date: 1 Aug 89 17:26:17 GMT
References: <5482@tekigm2.MEN.TEK.COM> <107@w2xo.UUCP> <10032@fluke.COM>
Sender: news@tc.fluke.COM
Distribution: usa
Organization: John Fluke Mfg. Co., Inc., Everett, WA
Lines: 22

In article <10032@fluke.COM> strong@tc.fluke.COM (Norm Strong) writes:
}In article <107@w2xo.UUCP> durham@w2xo.UUCP (Jim Durham) writes:
}
}[ lots deleted]
}
}}    (3c). If you are setting up for 70mv p/p, you would get only .707 times
}}      the value rms. However, it sounds like you are *way* down. You may
}}      have a problem. Low gain and rising response vs frequence usually
}}      spells dried-out electrolytic coupling capacitor somewhere. Is this
}}      a new unit?
}
}Correction:  70 mv p/p is 28mv rms.  You're off by a factor of 2.  
}-- 
}
}Norm   (strong@tc.fluke.com)

Correction of correction:  25mv rms


-- 

Norm   (strong@tc.fluke.com)