Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!lll-winken!uunet!mcvax!kth!sunic!tessan!patrik
From: patrik@tessan.datessa.se (Patrik Andreasen)
Newsgroups: sci.space
Subject: Re: Don't Mess with NASA (afterburners)
Summary: How about a fighter the USAF doesn't want?
Keywords: F-20 Tigershark
Message-ID: <191@tessan.datessa.se>
Date: 24 Jul 89 13:35:08 GMT
References: <8907201027.AA07833@osteocyber.ortho.hmc.psu.edu> <1989Jul20.184051.19979@utzoo.uucp> <116819@sun.Eng.Sun.COM>
Reply-To: patrik@tessan.UUCP (Patrik Andreasen)
Organization: Datessa AB
Lines: 4

(Various postings about how you can't by a fighter as your own personal toy)

But howzabout a F-20 Tigershark? After all the USAF didn't want it, and
there are 3 (or two?) prototypes that Northrop built on their own money.