Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!dgis!jkrueger
From: jkrueger@dgis.daitc.mil (Jonathan Krueger)
Newsgroups: comp.databases
Subject: Re: Extended RDB vs OODB
Keywords: CASE OODB
Message-ID: <18@dgis.daitc.mil>
Date: 11 Aug 89 22:04:11 GMT
References: <3560052@wdl1.UUCP> <408@odi.ODI.COM> <3324@rtech.rtech.com>
Organization: DTIC Special Projects Office (DTIC-SPO), Alexandria VA
Lines: 11

dennism@menace.rtech.COM (Dennis Moore, INGRES/teamwork) writes:
>I suggest that we will have all these object oriented features before these
>OODBMS companies have distributed database, development tools, bug elimination,
>installed base, customer-driven features, third party developers, high
>performance, and all the other things we expect for our $2K per user.

How about just shared, persistent data?  Is anyone out there willing to
describe his production OODB and state how many concurrent users access
it?  How many are actively updating it on a typical day?

-- Jon