Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!ginosko!uunet!dgis!jkrueger
From: jkrueger@dgis.daitc.mil (Jonathan Krueger)
Newsgroups: comp.databases
Subject: Re: Extended RDB vs OODB
Message-ID: <20@dgis.daitc.mil>
Date: 11 Aug 89 22:11:52 GMT
References: <3560052@wdl1.UUCP> <411@odi.ODI.COM> <458@cimshop.UUCP> <2177@cadillac.CAD.MCC.COM>
Organization: DTIC Special Projects Office (DTIC-SPO), Alexandria VA
Lines: 11

speyer@joy.cad.mcc.com (Bruce Speyer) writes:

>If an application must cross its process boundary in order to
>communicate with the database system it probably is at least two orders
>of magnitude too slow.  That is why all of the C++ based OODBMS efforts
>are using the application memory heap for the cache.

Could you provide some performance measurement data that qualify
and quantify this assertion?

-- Jon