Xref: utzoo comp.lang.c:20868 comp.misc:6852 Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!watmath!att!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!network!ucsd!orion.cf.uci.edu!uci-ics!zardoz!conexch!ccicpg!cci632!rit!tropix!moscom!ur-valhalla!uhura.cc.rochester.edu!sunybcs!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!ficc!peter From: peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva) Newsgroups: comp.lang.c,comp.misc Subject: Expert systems (Re: What's a C expert?) Keywords: philosophy, knowledge based applications, smart wet-ware Message-ID: <4597@ficc.uu.net> Date: 22 Jul 89 15:13:00 GMT References: <12214@well.UUCP> <2014@dataio.Data-IO.COM> Distribution: all Organization: Xenix Support Lines: 30 A jewel falls out of the net: In article <2014@dataio.Data-IO.COM> bright@Data-IO.COM (Walter Bright) differentiates between knowledge and wisdom. Subsequently... In article , cline@suntan.ece.clarkson.edu (Marshall Cline) writes: > Consider a large database containing all the valid > `C' constructs and idioms. It might be argued that the database contains > lots of `knowledge', but it (the database) clearly is NOT an `expert'. But, in fact, there are a lot of such databases out there that are referred to by that very name... "expert systems". > Thus the original poster asked the wrong question. It's not what you > need to know, since NO volume of knowledge can make one an expert. Yes. I think most expert systems should be referred to as "that-guy-in-the- corner-who-everyone-hates-but-can-answer-the-weirdest-questions systems". Or more succinctly "nerd systems". > [But this discussion probably belongs in "comp.lang.c.philosophy" :-)] I don't know. What groups would be appropriate? comp.ai? But that's an inet group :-<. -- Peter da Silva, Xenix Support, Ferranti International Controls Corporation. Business: uunet.uu.net!ficc!peter, peter@ficc.uu.net, +1 713 274 5180. Personal: ...!texbell!sugar!peter, peter@sugar.hackercorp.com.