Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!att!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!ateng!chip From: chip@ateng.com (Chip Salzenberg) Newsgroups: news.admin Subject: Re: to PEP or not to PEP? Message-ID: <24E725F7.3332@ateng.com> Date: 14 Aug 89 20:05:10 GMT References: <1989Aug10.175458.20369@utzoo.uucp> <7642@cbmvax.UUCP> Organization: A T Engineering, Tampa, FL Lines: 18 According to grr@cbmvax.UUCP (George Robbins): >It begins to seem like it would be nice if there was a widely distributed >batch mail protocol - most of the little, high overhead transfers are now >mail, often 13 messages forwarded to the same person from some non-digested >mailing list. I'll bet many people are tired of hearing this: "It's in Smail 3." Batch SMTP is directly supported by Smail 3. I really wish that Smail 3.1 could be posted, even though Smail 3.2 will be different; it's an extremely useful program, even with a few (tiny) warts. -- You may redistribute this article only to those who may freely do likewise. Chip Salzenberg | or A T Engineering | Me? Speak for my company? Surely you jest!