Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!sco!davidbe From: davidbe@sco.COM (The Cat in the Hat) Newsgroups: news.admin Subject: Re: DISCUSSION - modification of charter for news.announce.newgroups Message-ID: <5004@viscous.sco.COM> Date: 14 Aug 89 16:33:36 GMT References: <3960@ncar.ucar.edu= <629@sequoia.UUCP> <03Vo02th4a=301@amdahl.uts.amdahl.com> Sender: news@sco.COM Reply-To: davidbe@sco.COM (The Cat in the Hat) Organization: The Safeway Clergy Onslaught Lines: 20 I don't mind if n.a.n posts the newgroup messages. Indeed, it's handy for those people who don't read control to find out what groups they're missing at their site. I don't, however, want to see n.a.n cluttered with calls for discussion... especially when the given hierarchy doesn't necessarily need one. So keep the creation (and removal) messages as a public service, but have that be about all. or am I the only person to whom that sounds reasonable? -- David Bedno, Systems Administrator, The Santa Cruz Operation, Inc. Email: davidbe@sco.COM / ..!{uunet,sun,ucbvax!ucscc,gorn}!sco!davidbe Phone: 408-425-7222 x5123 Disclaimer: Speaking from SCO but not for SCO. Taste me! Taste me! I'm organic! - The Bobs