Xref: utzoo rec.audio:14516 sci.electronics:7416
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!usc!bbn!oliveb!amdahl!rtech!squid!reb
From: reb@squid.rtech.com (Richard Baum)
Newsgroups: rec.audio,sci.electronics
Subject: Re: Copy protection bit set on my CD player (digital out).
Message-ID: <3354@rtech.rtech.com>
Date: 14 Aug 89 15:01:56 GMT
References: <752@palladium.UUCP> <1183@sequent.cs.qmc.ac.uk> <sYsSd7600V4G80VdtN@andrew.cmu.edu>
Sender: news@rtech.rtech.com
Reply-To: reb@squid.UUCP (Richard Baum)
Organization: Relational Technology, Inc.
Lines: 14

In article <sYsSd7600V4G80VdtN@andrew.cmu.edu> jk3k+@andrew.cmu.edu (Joe Keane) writes:
>If you do it right, there are no aritfacts.  The original signal contains no
>energy above 22.05KHz, so you can represent it exactly with 48KHz sampling.  So
>you do some hairy matrix crunching, put them algorithm in ROM for a DSP, and
>sell the thing for big bucks.  Oh yes, it happens to have a switch remove the
>copy-protection bits.

I want a box - just like that mythical one you described 
             - with the "extra" switch!
                                                               reb
"If you want    Internet: reb@rtech.COM  or  reb%rtech.com@lll-winken.llnl.GOV
to end war      homeSMail: 861 Washington Ave Westwood, NJ 07675 h:201-666-9207
and  stuff 
you've got to sing loud - so people can hear you!" - Arlo Guthrie