Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!wuarchive!texbell!uhnix1!sugar!ficc!peter
From: peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva)
Newsgroups: comp.bugs.sys5
Subject: Re: vi(1) bug - defunct processes
Message-ID: <5796@ficc.uu.net>
Date: 20 Aug 89 15:41:01 GMT
References: <14562@bfmny0.UUCP> <40648@sgi.SGI.COM>
Organization: Xenix Support, FICC
Lines: 15

In article <40648@sgi.SGI.COM>, vjs@rhyolite.wpd.sgi.com (Vernon Schryver) writes:
> In article <14562@bfmny0.UUCP>, tneff@bfmny0.UUCP (Tom Neff) writes:
> > To heck with mailx(1), this is worse.

> Ha!  Nothing is worse than mailx(1), ...

Sure. The version of mailx(1) that comes with the System-3 based Xenixes
for Intel's 310/320 boxes. It's way worse.

And then there's /bin/mail...
-- 
Peter da Silva, *NIX support guy @ Ferranti International Controls Corporation.
Biz: peter@ficc.uu.net, +1 713 274 5180. Fun: peter@sugar.hackercorp.com. `-_-'
"Optimization is not some mystical state of grace, it is an intricate act   U
   of human labor which carries real costs and real risks." -- Tom Neff