Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!csd4.csd.uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!murtoa.cs.mu.oz.au!munnari.oz.au!!ok From: ok@.cs.mu.oz (Richard O'Keefe) Newsgroups: comp.cog-eng Subject: Re: What to know & universal icons Summary: arrows are not universal Message-ID: <1977@munnari.oz.au> Date: 30 Aug 89 08:33:17 GMT References: <56543@aerospace.AERO.ORG> <19238@mimsy.UUCP> Sender: news@cs.mu.oz.au Lines: 27 In article <19238@mimsy.UUCP>, don@brillig.umd.edu (Don Hopkins) suggests a left-pointing arrow for "left", a right-pointing arrow for "right", an upwards-pointing arrow for "up" or "forwards", and a downwards-pointing arrow for "down" or "backwards". (a) Real arrows are not a cultural universal. There are thriving cultures which had never heard of them until European contact. (b) The arrow signs are not very iconic. A few decades ago, the arrow signs were better pictures: more like <--------<<. This picture grossly exaggerates the arrow head, but at least it gets in the feathers, which are the important thing about an arrow. A picture like <- is *extremely* abstract; if I hadn't been told that it stood for an arrow I would never have guessed. (I had no such trouble with the older form.) In any case, most Westerners these days seldom see real arrows. <- looks more like a satellite antenna. (c) It isn't just the up/forward and down/backward arrows which are ambiguous. If you have a collection of icons being read from right to left, does the left-pointing arrow mean "in the same direction as you are reading" or "left"? I recently had serious trouble with a direction sign which I understood to mean "forwards then up" but turned out to mean "forwards then right". (The "forwards" part of the arrow in question was horizontal, pointing to my left, and the "right" part was vertical: ^ .) |___ (d) There's another ambiguity: does <- mean "left" or "west"? Bear in mind that 16th century maps used to be drawn with east at the top...