Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!wuarchive!texbell!vector!telecom-gateway From: covert@covert.enet.dec.com (John R. Covert 25-Aug-1989 0931) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom Subject: Overseas Calling Card Rates Message-ID: Date: 25 Aug 89 15:12:42 GMT Sender: news@vector.Dallas.TX.US Lines: 144 Approved: telecom-request@vector.dallas.tx.us X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@vector.dallas.tx.us X-TELECOM-Digest: volume 9, issue 327, message 1 of 7 >Moderator's Note: You are in error in saying that the rate for calls from >other countries to the United States is detirmined by AT&T. Apparently what >you are claiming is that AT&T sets the rates for all the telcos everywhere >in the world when the calls are made on AT&T cards. AT&T sets the rates it charges AT&T customers for calls to the U.S. from overseas. This is the agreed upon practice for the handling of international calls. When a person from the U.K. calls home to the U.K. from the U.S. with a British Telecom card, the U.K., not the U.S., rate applies. When an AT&T customer calls the U.S. from the U.K., or Chile, or any other country which allows the use of AT&T cards or which allows AT&T to provide USA-Direct service, the U.S. dertermined rate, which AT&T has filed with the FCC, applies. >Now it so happens that in some cases the rates are the same in both >directions, allowing for money conversion; but this has *nothing* to do with >the fact that the call is billed to an AT&T card. The above three lines have no basis in fact. By charging the U.S. rate for calls to the U.S. from overseas AT&T avoids worrying about currency conversion. >You say your phone bills 'will prove it', however I sincerely doubt you can >produce a phone bills showing a call from every country in the world to the >same phone in the United States and a bill showing a call in the opposite >direction where the price, considering conversion from local currency, is >the same. I travel extensively internationally, and can produce phone bills for calls to the U.S. from many countries. The rate is invariably the AT&T U.S. rate. >The various PTT's set their rates and terms. AT&T does not dictate to them >and tell them what they can or cannot charge. The PTTs set the rates they bill their customers. They do not set the rates AT&T bills AT&T customers; those rates are set by AT&T. Face it, Patrick, you are simply mistaken. Admit that you are wrong. >In some countries, AT&T cards are not even accepted! This is correct. Germany is one example. But collect calls can be placed from Germany through PTT operators, and will be billed at the U.S. rate. Germany doesn't have a rate for collect or credit card calls, because neither concept even exists for calls within Germany or for Germans travelling outside Germany. The same rate will be charged for the collect call to the U.S. whether the call is placed through a Deutsche Bundespost operator or through a USA-Direct operator. And while we're discussing Germany, here are the applicable rates. I travel to Germany at least once or twice a year. Calling the U.S. from Germany, a station-to-station calling card call placed via USA-Direct will cost 6.62 for the first three minutes, 1.09 for each additional minute. No discount periods apply. [Source: AT&T International Rate and Dialing Information Service, 800 874-4000. Confirmed by calls appearing on my phone bill on 2 April 1989.] Calling to Germany from the U.S: Dial Initial Minute Op Assisted 3 Mins Each additional minute Econ Disc Standard Station Person Econ Disc Standard 1.16 1.46 1.94 6.62 8.82 .65 .82 1.09 [Source: AT&T Pub 1WB311 dated 11/88] Calling to the U.S. from Germany, paid in Germany: One message unit (DM 0.23) every 1.882 seconds M-F noon-midnight, every 2.28 seconds at other times. This works out, at the exchange rate of 1.9555 quoted in today's paper, to be DM 7.33 or $3.75 per minute during the higher rate period or DM 6.05 or $3.10 per minute during the cheap rate period. Since hotels charge between DM.50 and DM.70 per message unit, a person calling the U.S. from a hotel could be shocked with a charge of $114.13 for a ten minute call to the U.S. instead of the $37.50 the call would have cost if directly dialled from a private phone or $14.75 if placed through USA-Direct. [Source for German rates: Postbuch der Deutschen Bundespost] >It is *only* on USA Direct calls that the calling card rate is the same coming >here as it is in calls going there. No, Patrick, this is *not* the way it works. When billing a call placed to the U.S. from overseas to an AT&T card, "you pay the same rate whether you use USA-Direct or the local PTT operator." >The charge for USA Direct from Japan does not vary with the time of day. Correct. As I said, the times for discount periods may differ, and there may, in fact, be no discount period for calls back to the U.S. It appears that the discount periods were eliminated for several countries some time within the past few months. >It costs somewhere in between night rate and evening rate from the U.S. My >statements are based upon information which is a couple months old; the >charges may have changed in the meantime. The charges haven't changed in the last few years. You will find that you were charged $8.87 for the first three minutes and $1.35 each additional minute. This rate applies for station-to-station calls from Japan to the U.S. billed in the U.S. regardless of whether they were placed through an operator in Japan or through USA-Direct and regardless of the time of day. It is the same as the day rate for operator assisted calls from the U.S. to Japan. >Moderator's Note: Best tell Mr. Covert about this. He claims calls to or >from the USA and other countries are *always* the same rate when the >AT&T Calling Card is used. As you note, Japan has no time-of-day pricing >to call here. We do have when calling there. Ergo, different rates, even >on the card. I never claimed "calls to or from the USA and other countries are *always* the same rate when the AT&T calling card is used." I said that the rate billed to the AT&T calling card for calls to the U.S. is always the same for USA-Direct and for PTT operator-placed calls. I stated that the U.S. rate applies, but I also stated that discount periods may be different. They may be so different as to be non-existant, or the discount rate may apply, but never the economy rate. Patrick, please don't put words into my mouth, and please check your information before you post answers to people's questions or rebuttals to statements made by readers. You are doing a disservice to the readers of Telecom Digest by posting incorrect information and standing firm on that incorrect information. If you don't have documentation that something is correct, at least indicate that what you are saying is opinion, not fact. /john [Moderator's Note: Okay, it is my 'opinion' that AT&T does not tell the PTT's of the world what they can or cannot charge Americans who use the phones in those countries to call the United States. It is my 'opinion' that AT&T has no authority whatsoever in setting the phone rates in other countries merely because the caller happens to be an American calling to the United States. It may be true that AT&T has that agreement in some places -- but *everywhere* in the world? And if AT&T can and does in fact dictate to the PTT's regarding their (the PTT's) acceptance of AT&T calling cards and rates, then why not calling periods also? Why does AT&T 'permit' even that much latitude in the rate setting? Why don't the PTT's tell AT&T to get lost? An American without a calling card is one who will simply shove a fistful of coins in the phone. Doesn't that make better sense financially to the foreign telco? Does MCI also dictate to the PTT's who connect with MCI-Direct (or whatever it is called)? If not, why not? I don't care what AT&T International Information Service says, I would like someone from British Telecom or someone from Australia or Japan to post a message saying "AT&T sets the rates we are allowed on calls to the USA using the AT&T Card." Just my 'opinion' of course! PT]