Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!csd4.csd.uwm.edu!uxc.cso.uiuc.edu!uxc.cso.uiuc.edu!m.cs.uiuc.edu!s.cs.uiuc.edu!mccaugh
From: mccaugh@s.cs.uiuc.edu
Newsgroups: comp.graphics
Subject: Re: Voyager images
Message-ID: <207400020@s.cs.uiuc.edu>
Date: 25 Aug 89 05:49:00 GMT
References: <4786@portia.Stanford.EDU>
Lines: 14
Nf-ID: #R:portia.Stanford.EDU:4786:s.cs.uiuc.edu:207400020:000:710
Nf-From: s.cs.uiuc.edu!mccaugh    Aug 25 00:49:00 1989


Responding to:  rick@hanauma  re: Voyager images

> It would be nice if JPL-NASA would make representative sample available.
> Fortunately this time we are able to digitize the cable TV stuff on computers.
> It is inferior to the original data, but better than nothing.

  I believe if you write JPL-NASA, they might help you. Also, I was curious
  as to what is meant by "it (digitized cable TV stuff) is inferior to the
  original data:": does that mean the original data wasn't digitized ( as in:
  analog), or that it was but you needed to sacrifice resolution? And by what
  factor is it inferior?
  The reason I ask is that it might be possible to enhance the digitized
  images (then again, maybe not).