Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!att!dptg!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!kddlab!titcca!sragwa!wsgw!socslgw!diamond
From: diamond@csl.sony.co.jp (Norman Diamond)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Right-to-left (was: Re: entry at other than main)
Message-ID: <10761@riks.csl.sony.co.jp>
Date: 30 Aug 89 02:49:54 GMT
References: <19173@mimsy.UUCP> <207600032@s.cs.uiuc.edu> <19218@mimsy.UUCP> <10731@riks.csl.sony.co.jp> <230@ssp1.idca.tds.philips.nl> <1989Aug26.221107.25606@utzoo.uucp> <818@skye.ed.ac.uk> <673@philmtl.philips.ca>
Reply-To: diamond@riks. (Norman Diamond)
Organization: Sony Computer Science Laboratory Inc., Tokyo, Japan
Lines: 23

In article <818@skye.ed.ac.uk> richard@aiai.UUCP (Richard Tobin) writes:

>>.... there are lisp systems without an interpreter at all -
>>when you type in an expression, they compile it and execute the code
>>immediately.

In article <673@philmtl.philips.ca> ray@philmtl.philips.ca (Raymond Dunn) writes:

>This just shows that a very hazy line separates "compilers" and "interpreters".
>There are many of us who would still call such an incremental compiler an
>interpreter.

There is a difference.  The compiled code can be executed again without
requiring compilation again.

1000000 * (execution time) + 1 * (compilation time) usually <
1000000 * (interpretation time).

-- 
Norman Diamond, Sony Corporation (diamond@ws.sony.junet)
  The above opinions are inherited by your machine's init process (pid 1),
  after being disowned and orphaned.  However, if you see this at Waterloo or
  Anterior, then their administrators must have approved of these opinions.