Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!ukma!uflorida!ufqtp!bernhold
From: bernhold@qtp.ufl.edu (David E. Bernholdt)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.fortran
Subject: Re: Review document
Message-ID: <650@orange19.qtp.ufl.edu>
Date: 28 Aug 89 02:00:10 GMT
References: <649@orange19.qtp.ufl.edu> <307@unmvax.unm.edu> <1599@convex.UUCP>
Reply-To: bernhold@orange19 (David E. Bernholdt)
Organization: University of Florida Quantum Theory Project
Lines: 20

In article <1599@convex.UUCP> psmith@convex.com  (Presley Smith) writes:
>... the proposed
>standard that Lahey is distributing is NOT considered an "official copy"
>of the proposed standard.  

Regardless of the fact that CBMEA does not sanction the Lahey
distribution, is the Lahey document *identical* to the CBMEA document?

If not, how do they differ and why?
If they are, then what does this (below) mean?

>He also told me that any appeal to ANSI based on non-official copies of
>the standard would be rejected without further consideration.

Just trying to keep everything straight...
-- 
David Bernholdt			bernhold@qtp.ufl.edu
Quantum Theory Project		bernhold@ufpine.bitnet
University of Florida
Gainesville, FL  32611		904/392 6365