Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!csd4.csd.uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!yale!eagle!jtreworgy
From: jtreworgy@eagle.wesleyan.edu
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Software thieves
Message-ID: <573@eagle.wesleyan.edu>
Date: 22 Aug 89 10:21:06 GMT
References: <30706@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> <6846@rpi.edu> <2361@raspail.cdcnet.cdc.com> <6865@rpi.edu> <58013@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu> <6876@rpi.edu> <1160@sas.UUCP>
Distribution: usa
Lines: 14

In article <1160@sas.UUCP>, walker@sas.UUCP (Doug Walker) writes:
> I can't believe we're having this discussion AGAIN.  Nobody ever convinces these
> assholes that they are stealing, guys, so don't bother trying.  It's not even
> worth discussing.  Please, let's raise the signal-to-noise ratio and drop the
> whole thing.

Incredibly, you've managed to be hypocrytical in four sentences. If you're
trying to get people to drop the discussion, I would suggest saying so rather
than using an ad hominem argument to support your point of view (and
of course perpetuating the argument).
-- 
James A. Treworgy
jtreworgy@eagle.wesleyan.edu
jtreworgy%eagle@WESLEYAN.BITNET