Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!lilink!intern
From: intern@lilink.UUCP (Steve Faiwisewski)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Subject: Re: RCS or SCCS on the Amiga Native?
Keywords: Revision Control Systems
Message-ID: <825@lilink.UUCP>
Date: 28 Aug 89 20:11:39 GMT
References: <7751@cbmvax.UUCP> <2607@iscuva.ISCS.COM>
Reply-To: intern@lilink.UUCP (Steve Faiwisewski)
Organization: LILINK Public Xenix, Long Island, New York
Lines: 20

In article <2607@iscuva.ISCS.COM> ricks@iscuva.ISCS.COM (Rick Schaeffer) writes:
>In article <7751@cbmvax.UUCP> mks@cbmvax.UUCP (Michael Sinz - CATS) writes:
>>Has anyone done a port to Native AmigaDOS of RCS or SCCS?
>...but it also has problems with "death of a child" and also requires use
>of ARP and Conman, which I want to avoid if possible.
>-- 
>Rick Schaeffer          UUCP:  uunet!iscuva.iscs.com!ricks
>ISC-Bunker Ramo                ricks@iscuva.iscs.com

I don't understand why you want to avoid using ARP?  ARP is popular,
and lots of people have it (and it should be made more popular by
using it in different products).  You can always distribute ARP along
with your application.  I feel the same about ConMan, but I understand
why you might want to avoid ut.

	- Steve -
-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Steve Faiwiszewski					intern@lilink.UUCP
							intern@dasys1.UUCP