Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!gatech!udel!new
From: new@udel.EDU (Darren New)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Subject: Re: RCS or SCCS on the Amiga Native?
Keywords: Revision Control Systems
Message-ID: <22766@louie.udel.EDU>
Date: 29 Aug 89 17:08:04 GMT
References: <7751@cbmvax.UUCP> <2607@iscuva.ISCS.COM> <825@lilink.UUCP>
Sender: usenet@udel.EDU
Reply-To: new@udel.EDU (Darren New)
Organization: University of Delaware
Lines: 14

In article <825@lilink.UUCP> intern@lilink.UUCP (Steve Faiwisewski) writes:
>I don't understand why you want to avoid using ARP?  ARP is popular,
>Steve Faiwiszewski					intern@lilink.UUCP

I can't speak for anyone else, but I avoid it primarily because of the
incompatibilities and bugs that are discussed on the net here.
"Mount has to be tweaked this way", "ARP Run does not quite work",
"Resident needs this new parameter", etc.  If it was kept compatible,
I would probably use it.   I would like to use the ARP library
for file requestors and such, but I have not seen any documentation
on doing so (it must be out there, but I haven't seen it).

Since I now have a hard disk (yea!) the savings in size are 
insignificant.                -- Darren