Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!iuvax!rutgers!mcnc!ecsvax!utoddl
From: utoddl@ecsvax.uncecs.edu (Todd M. Lewis)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Subject: Re: Dealing with multiple scripting languages (was: Elinating the 'rx' from AREXX)
Summary: // in ANSI C
Message-ID: <7611@ecsvax.uncecs.edu>
Date: 30 Aug 89 20:24:37 GMT
References: <721@lpami.wimsey.bc.ca> <Aug.28.20.36.04.1989.10186@pilot.njin.net> <31742@lll-winken.LLNL.GOV>
Organization: UNC Educational Computing Service
Lines: 14

In article <31742@lll-winken.LLNL.GOV>, jac@muslix.llnl.gov (James Crotinger) writes:
> and both have said "no". Similarly, I've yet to C a book on the ANSI
> standard which says it supports // comments. I hope that ANSI
> did decide to add these at the last minute. I certainly can't see any
> harm in doing so...

  a = b //* Go ahead, break my code! */ c;

_____        
  |      Todd M. Lewis            Disclaimer: If you want my employer's
  ||\/|  utoddl@ecsvax.uncecs.edu             ideas, you'll have to
  ||  || utoddl@ecsvax.bitnet                 _buy_ them. 
   |  ||     
       |___   (Never write a program bigger than your screen.)