Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!att!icus!lilink!intern
From: intern@lilink.UUCP (Steve Faiwisewski)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Subject: Re: RCS or SCCS on the Amiga Native?
Keywords: Revision Control Systems
Message-ID: <828@lilink.UUCP>
Date: 30 Aug 89 16:54:48 GMT
References: <7751@cbmvax.UUCP> <2607@iscuva.ISCS.COM> <825@lilink.UUCP> <22766@louie.udel.EDU>
Reply-To: intern@lilink.UUCP (Steve Faiwisewski)
Organization: LILINK Public Xenix, Long Island, New York
Lines: 24

In article <22766@louie.udel.EDU> new@udel.EDU (Darren New) writes:
>In article <825@lilink.UUCP> intern@lilink.UUCP (Steve Faiwisewski) writes:
>>I don't understand why you want to avoid using ARP?  ARP is popular,
>>Steve Faiwiszewski					intern@lilink.UUCP
>
>I can't speak for anyone else, but I avoid it primarily because of the
>incompatibilities and bugs that are discussed on the net here.
>"Mount has to be tweaked this way", "ARP Run does not quite work",
>"Resident needs this new parameter", etc.
>                -- Darren

I personally never had problems with any ARP command (but then again, I
don't use ARP's run).  But just because you don't like the ARP
commands doesn't mean that you have to avoid the ARP library, which is
a wonderful collection of routines.  You may distribute arp.library
without any of the accompanying commands.  There are docs available
for the library.  I have the docs for ARP 1.1, and I believe that the
1.3 docs are out already (but don't quote me on that).

	- Steve -
-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Steve Faiwiszewski					intern@lilink.UUCP
							intern@dasys1.UUCP