Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!watmath!iuvax!mailrus!wasatch!cs.utah.edu!zeleznik
From: zeleznik%cs.utah.edu@wasatch.utah.edu (Mike Zeleznik)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apollo
Subject: Re: DN1000 vs DN3500 file size
Message-ID: <3187@wasatch.utah.edu>
Date: 23 Aug 89 20:12:56 GMT
References: <2535@orion.cf.uci.edu>
Organization: University of Utah CS Dept
Lines: 24

In article <2535@orion.cf.uci.edu> roode@hydra.cf.uci.edu (Dana Roode) writes:
>We have a DN10000 running SR10.0 and a DN3500 running SR10.1.  Why does a
>file occupying 992 blocks (according to ls -s) on the DN1000 take only
>247 blocks (also according to ls -s) when copied to the DN3500? 
>
> Dana Roode
> UCI

Our 10K bsd4.3 du returns 4X the space that either /com/lst or /com/ld -a
(and adding them up) do.  I think ls -s returns the same as du (4X).  

I was told this was a problem in 10.0, but was fixed in 10.1, but we have
10.1 and still see it.  Our 10.1 is dated May 8, 1989 (bldt).

The version of du (from ts) which works CORRECTLY (our local office has it)
seems to be Feb 6 1989, 14:00:33. The version WE have is something like
10/5/88.  

Mike

  Michael Zeleznik              Computer Science Dept.
                                University of Utah
  zeleznik@cs.utah.edu          Salt Lake City, UT  84112
                                (801) 581-5617