Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ames!eos!shelby!decwrl!shlump.nac.dec.com!mountn.dec.com!memit.dec.com From: shatara@memit.dec.com (Chris Shatara) Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple Subject: Re: SCSI TIMER & V5.0 Message-ID: <707@mountn.dec.com> Date: 27 Aug 89 13:45:59 GMT Sender: news@mountn.dec.com Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation Lines: 34 # ## I have already optimized the interleave under V4.0 with a 40% improvement ## in read times and was wondering if the interleave should change because ## of the SCSI driver improvements in System 5.0 # #When you reran these and got a 40% improvement was it because you changed #the interleaf? (Or maybe it was because of the driver/ADU improvements in #V4.0?) (I really am asking. I'm not trying to put words in your mouth. I #would like to know since I formatted my drive under version three.) # The improvement was from the interleave. The reason I say this Is that I ran the disk for a month under V4.0 BEFORE I got a copy of SCSI hacker and Timer. I never ran the hard disk under System software V3.2. I just finish this procedure again with new system disk. As before I ran a while with the old interleave settings and by changing them was able to reduce the read times by another 15% (according to SCSI timer). Interesting enough the docs which came with SS 5.0 suggested 1:1 or 1:2 as an interleave setting (infact the software would use one of these settings if you allowed it to do the low level format) I ended up with a setting of 5. (4 gave me the lowest setting and 5 gave me some margine for tolerances). I am running with an Apple SCSI board and a SEAGATE st138N drive. /chris ============================================================================= | Chris Shatara | Internet: shatara@memit.dec.com | | | shatara@memit.enet.dec.com | | Opinions expressed are | DEC Easynet: memit::shatara | | mine and mine only! | UUCP: ...!decwrl!memit!shatara | =============================================================================