Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!DHDURZ1.BITNET!V61 From: V61@DHDURZ1.BITNET (Ronald Lamprecht) Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st Subject: Duesseldorf: personal impression of the TT(T) Message-ID: <8908251936.AA19454@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU> Date: 25 Aug 89 19:36:53 GMT Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Organization: The Internet Lines: 31 X-Unparsable-Date: Fri, 25 Aug 89 21:07:21 CET Just returned from the Atari fair at Duesseldorf. Several working TTs that have been definitly faster than a ST (Atari says by a factor of 4): -68030, 16MHz - VME slot (A24,D16) - shared RAM for video and processor with an access time of 250ns - tiny ugly box with the old ST keyboard with it's famous function keys Price: appr. DM 5700 -- including 30MB Harddisk and color monitor (They said it wouldn't be sold without the Harddisk or the color monitor -- no chance for a cheap upgrade) Seeing this I called it a TTT --- namely a Tic Tac Toe machine: You will never loose something with respect to the old ST, but you have no chance to win a jackpot with it. Actually I would call it a wastage of highly sophisticated microprocessors the way an 68030 is slowed down to 2MHz Busfrequency. A (A24,D16) VME slot that would have been something useful for the ST, but an 68030 should be worth an full 32bit VME slot ! A speedupfactor of 4 that's a shame and I'm quite sure the TT will be the slowest 68030 machine that will ever exist. I wouldn't call the TTT a workstation -- and I won't buy it. Remainig the question what will be my NeXT computer ? Or should I upgrade my 'ST' with transputers or a 68030 with fast 32 bit RAM ? I don't need TOS compatibility because I'm using Minix. Sorry if my impression of the TT is quite negative, but I'm disappointed because I thought it could be my next machine. Bitnet: V61@DHDURZ1 Ronald Lamprecht UUCP: ...!unido!DHDURZ1.bitnet!V61 Theoretische Physik ARPAnet: V61%DHDURZ1.BITNET@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU (Heidelberg, West Germany)