Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!agate!pasteur!cory.Berkeley.EDU!landay
From: landay@cory.Berkeley.EDU (James A. Landay)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Re: Rebuttal time
Message-ID: <16658@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU>
Date: 30 Aug 89 01:11:51 GMT
References: <8908252144.AA27005@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU> <123950@sun.Eng.Sun.COM>
Sender: news@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU
Reply-To: landay@cory.Berkeley.EDU.UUCP (James A. Landay)
Organization: University of California, Berkeley
Lines: 23

In article <123950@sun.Eng.Sun.COM> cmcmanis@sun.UUCP (Chuck McManis) writes:
>Lets see if we can find those silent individuals who can present the
>opposing cases. 
>and the ST/Mac/PC user who is saying :
>	"You know, if only I had a multitasking OS, this is what 
>	 I could accomplish."
>
>Thanks for listening,
>--Chuck McManis
>uucp: {anywhere}!sun!cmcmanis   BIX: cmcmanis  ARPAnet: cmcmanis@sun.com


I am an Atari ST user.  I would love to have a multitasking OS, because I
KNOW what kind of stuff I can do with it (from using Unix, X, Suns, etc.)

Anyone who says otherwise must not have had much experience with
multitasking OSs.


James A. Landay

ARPA:       landay@cory.berkeley.edu
             ..!ucbvax!cory!landay