Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!csd4.csd.uwm.edu!bionet!agate!ucbvax!ucsfcgl!cca.ucsf.edu!wet!logic From: logic@wet.UUCP (Henry Kwan) Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st Subject: Re: HELP IDENTIFYING SEAGATE 296N WITH REV. 7 ROM Message-ID: <502@wet.UUCP> Date: 30 Aug 89 06:39:12 GMT References: <2520@orion.cf.uci.edu> <5440050@hplsla.HP.COM> <3409@blake.acs.washington.edu> Reply-To: logic@wet.UUCP (Henry Kwan) Organization: Wetware Diversions, San Francisco Lines: 39 In article <3409@blake.acs.washington.edu> bissiri@blake.acs.washington.edu (Moja Fritzah) writes: > >[stuff deleted] > >I saw many advertisements for the 296N delivering 1:1 interleave >FOR the ATARI ST. Both dealers and mail-order houses confirmed that >the 296N went 1:1 on the 1040ST. The selling price at that time >was $620-$750 for the mech alone. I bought the drive. Formatted >it with Supra software. The drive worked. As i had previously ^^^^^ > Were you also using a Supra host adapter at the time? I have been trying to find an ICD host adapter owner who has been afflicted with this curse. I've failed so far. (BTW, I am one of the Supra host adapter user who has experienced this problem with Seagate drives but that cleared up when I switched to an ICD.) > > [stuff about the 296N and Seagate deleted] > >So i bought a quantum 80, which is faster than a Seagate, but NOT >too fast for an ST. > Heck, if an Imprimis 94181-702 or an 94181-385H isn't too fast for a ST, there is no way that a Seagate can be! Of course, there is the problem of "bottleneck" though. After a certain point, buying a faster hard drive just doesn't speed up real world performance anymore. [These few lines don't really belong here but inews simply will not let me post this article unless I "fill" it out a bit with excess "non-quoted" lines. Sigh...] -- Henry Kwan - FWB, Inc. | "Experience varies directly claris!wet!logic@ames.arc.nasa.gov | with equipment ruined." cca.ucsf.edu!wet!logic@cgl.ucsf.edu | {claris,ucsfcca,hoptoad,lamc}!wet!logic | -- Tech Support