Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!csd4.csd.uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!portal!cup.portal.com!Bob_BobR_Retelle From: Bob_BobR_Retelle@cup.portal.com Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st Subject: Re: Food for thought Message-ID: <21685@cup.portal.com> Date: 29 Aug 89 23:39:32 GMT References: <21577@cup.portal.com> <11101@boulder.Colorado.EDU> Distribution: na Organization: The Portal System (TM) Lines: 40 Talking about the US version of the ST being different from the European versions of the ST, Harmut Semken says: >Not true. >The machine is the same. The ROMs are not, and neither are the >keyboards. >There is a british, french, german, US and probably a spanish(?) version of >the machine. In another posting, he says: >Comparing a german and a british ST (520 STMs), I would say, the german >one is shielded somewhat better (filter circurits on all lines to >external connectors; missing in british model etc.) Lars-Eric Osterund says: >Infact there are swedish ROM versions too (it used too be norwegian too) The point is, while the basic design of the machine is the same, the end product is not. Someone at Atari has to sit at a desk and say, "This month we'll manufacture 10,000 STs. In 4,000 we'll install German ROMS and keyboards, install all the "Stoerfestigkeit" and "Hochfrequenzabstrahlung" RF shielding and put them in boxes printed in German, with German manuals and include disk with software specifically selected for the German marketplace, including a nifty version of BASIC. In another 4000, we'll include the British versions of all the above. In maybe 1,000 or so, we'll install the Swedish ROMs and keyboard firmware, manuals and software. Then, let's see, that leaves 1,000 STs for the US marketplace, with FCC shielding and US manuals, power supplies and software, and put into boxes printed for the US market." It is NOT a matter of "diverting product" to the US marketplace. The German STs would be virtually useless in the US if "diverted" here. Atari Corp. has to make specific decisions about which models to produce, which was the point of this "food for thought." BobR