Xref: utzoo comp.sys.att:7361 alt.drugs:362
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!csd4.csd.uwm.edu!marque!doug
From: doug@marque.mu.edu
Newsgroups: comp.sys.att,alt.drugs
Subject: Re: REALLY!
Keywords: Siegal
Message-ID: <9551@marque.mu.edu>
Date: 22 Aug 89 21:08:04 GMT
References: <21361@paris.ics.uci.edu> <1989Aug22.045207.26952@i88.isc.com>
Sender: usenet@marque.mu.edu
Reply-To: doug@marque.mu.edu (Douglas Harris)
Followup-To: comp.sys.att
Organization: Marquette University - Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Lines: 13
Approved: usenet@marque.mu.edu

I can perhaps understand that there is an argument whether AT&T should
"censor" alt.drugs, although the very meaning of alt.anything is that it 
can be censored.  But to foul up comp.sys.att is not to deny anything
to AT&T, it is to deny something to those of us who are interested in
AT&T computers.  Our purchase and continued use of those machines is not
related to whether or not AT&T uses its corporate facilities to transfer
alternate newsgroups.  If you wish to try to persuade AT&T to change
this decision (good luck :-) please pursue appropriate avenues that do
not trample on the rights of others.

Douglas Harris
doug@marque.mu.edu
uunet!marque!doug