Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!csd4.csd.uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!wuarchive!kuhub.cc.ukans.edu!jli
From: JLI@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: WARNING: Counterfeit 3.5 HD disks!
Message-ID: <9857@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu>
Date: 26 Aug 89 01:23:29 GMT
References: <44566@bbn.COM> <40970021@hpindda.HP.COM> <2503@husc6.harvard.edu> <145@bmers58.UUCP> <2512@husc6.harvard.edu> <Aug.25.08.06.20.1989.24239@topaz.rutgers.edu>
Organization: University of Kansas Academic Computing Services
Lines: 10

In article <Aug.25.08.06.20.1989.24239@topaz.rutgers.edu>, msmith@topaz.rutgers.edu (Mark Robert Smith) writes:
>  ... , the only difference between DD and HD disks is the
> Quality Control used.  HD disks have higher QC standards, because
> there is less room for error on them.
> 
> At least, that's how it was explained to me.
> 

Sorry, I don't think this is entirely true.  I was told that they
have different coating on them.