Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!att!chinet!randy
From: randy@chinet.chi.il.us (Randy Suess)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: DESQview, any opinions out there?
Message-ID: <9364@chinet.chi.il.us>
Date: 25 Aug 89 22:47:09 GMT
References: <4808@ubc-cs.UUCP> <5190037@hplsla.HP.COM> <9710@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu>
Reply-To: randy@chinet.chi.il.us (Randy Suess)
Organization: Chinet - Public Access Unix
Lines: 15

In article <9710@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu> JLI@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu writes:
]I agree!  It works great on LAN systems.  If you don't intend to
]use window applications (i.e. PageMaker, Word ... etc) very frequently,
]DesqView is a good choice. 

	Oh?  I run Windows/286, Excell, AMI, and many other Windows
	programs under Desqview on my 386 machine.  I get even more
	memory for windows aps then under dos, because I can move
	all my tsr's and device drivers into hi memory with loadhi.
	-randy


-- 
Randy Suess
randy@chinet.chi.il.us