Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ames!amdahl!pacbell!indetech!fiver!palowoda From: palowoda@fiver.UUCP (Bob Palowoda) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc Subject: Re: DESQview, any opinions out there? Message-ID: <142@fiver.UUCP> Date: 26 Aug 89 20:07:56 GMT References: <5190037@hplsla.HP.COM> Organization: Fiver Communications Fremont, Ca Lines: 44 From article <5190037@hplsla.HP.COM>, by davidr@hplsla.HP.COM (David M. Reed): [some text removed] > > DESQview has true multi-tasking (even on a 286 system with EEMS), while > MSWindows can not do it properly even in Windows/386. DESQview cares very I got to stick my two cents in here. For many years I tried many different multi-tasking programs for DOS and even if some worked well like DESQview I would eventually find some way to crash the system. I have tried DESQview, VM386, Taskview, MSwindows, Double DOS etc. One of the *most* important things to me is running a multi-tasking envirnment that dosn't crash the system. Performance and limited memory where not a concern. What I didn't like was running some program that would lock up the system while all the other programs where doing disk writes and than corrupting my disk fat tables. Than after that I would have to reformat over 200meg and reinstall the software. The problem seems to be when running programs compiled with MSC 286 (could be others). What happens is that one program running in a window writes to the address space of a program running in another window. If it writes to the execution code of the other window it alters the the other a number of things can happen, most of the time it locks up the system or worse writes incorrect data to the disk (sometimes not updateing the fat tables). This has happened to me more than once. I started running DOS under UNIX with a dos emulator and these problems don't seem to occur. The multi-tasking of dos under unix seems to run more smoothly. Slower but doing alot of disk writes dosn't bring the system to it's knees like it does with Desqview. And you get a full 640k in the dos partition. Of coarse thier is drawbacks to this. It is expensive and your sure to find some software it cannot run under the emulator. ---Bob -- Bob Palowoda *Home of Fiver BBS* login: bbs Home {sun,dasiy}!ys2!fiver!palowoda (415)-623-8809 1200/2400 Work {sun,pyramid,decwrl}!megatest!palowoda (415)-623-8806 1200/2400/9600/19200 Voice: (415)-623-7495 Public access UNIX system