Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!csd4.csd.uwm.edu!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!ginosko!uunet!mcsun!hp4nl!philapd!ssp15!jos
From: jos@idca.tds.PHILIPS.nl (Jos Vos)
Newsgroups: comp.text
Subject: Re: Underlining in troff
Message-ID: <1253@ssp15.idca.tds.philips.nl>
Date: 24 Aug 89 05:29:05 GMT
References: <266@opel.UUCP>
Organization: Philips Telecommunication and Data Systems, The Netherlands
Lines: 15

In article <266@opel.UUCP> johnk@opel.UUCP (John Kennedy) writes:

>- Is there a way I can get font #2 to produced underlined output
>  instead of italicized, ala the way nroff substitutes underlines
>  for italics?   It seems I once read about a reg you could set
>  that would effect this globally, but I can't find it now.

I never did hear about such a hidden register. And I really think
it isn't possible. Only by letting your postprocessor generating
an underlined character for every character in some font.
But then you have to adapt your postprocessor (source).

-- 
-- ######   Jos Vos   ######   Internet   jos@idca.tds.philips.nl   ######
-- ######             ######   UUCP         ...!mcvax!philapd!jos   ######