Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!csd4.csd.uwm.edu!wuarchive!wugate!uunet!auspex!guy
From: guy@auspex.auspex.com (Guy Harris)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions
Subject: Re: Unix without tar?
Message-ID: <2402@auspex.auspex.com>
Date: 31 Aug 89 17:59:11 GMT
References: <JES.89Aug30102233@mbio.med.upenn.edu>
Reply-To: guy@auspex.auspex.com (Guy Harris)
Organization: Auspex Systems, Santa Clara
Lines: 11

>Recently, someone asserted that tar archives aren't a suitable
>distribution format because they aren't understood by every Unix.
>
>Given some reasonable constraints of their contents (ascii files,
>names < 14 chars), is this true?  Doesn't every Unix have tar?

Every version of UNIX AT&T has shipped as a source code porting base
has, to the best of my knowledge, had "tar".  I remember one case where
it was claimed that a vendor offering a binary version built from one of
those AT&T source versions had removed "tar", but hopefully that vendor
was tarred and feathered for that, and served as an example to others.