Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!AUREL.CALTECH.EDU!bfox
From: bfox@AUREL.CALTECH.EDU (Brian Fox)
Newsgroups: gnu.bash.bug
Subject: [idallen@watcgl: bash aliases not transitive?!]
Message-ID: <8908232037.AA02389@aurel.caltech.edu>
Date: 23 Aug 89 20:37:07 GMT
References: <8908231938.AA03422@watmath.waterloo.edu>
Sender: daemon@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu
Reply-To: bfox@aurel.caltech.edu
Distribution: gnu
Organization: GNUs Not Usenet
Lines: 40


   Date: Wed, 23 Aug 89 15:38:47 EDT
   From: Andy Wai <accwai@watmath.waterloo.edu>

   > Date: Wed, 23 Aug 89 09:50:51 PDT
   > From: bfox@aurel.caltech.edu (Brian Fox)
   > Reply-To: bfox@aurel.caltech.edu
   > 
   >    Date: Wed, 23 Aug 89 11:45:28 EDT
   >    From: Andy Wai <accwai@watmath.waterloo.edu>
   > 
   >    > Date: Tue, 22 Aug 89 20:35:20 EDT
   >    > From: "Ian! D. Allen [CGL]" <idallen@watcgl>
   >    > To: accwai@watmath
   >    > Subject: bash aliases not transitive?!
   >    >
   >    >     bash$ alias a=b
   >    >     bash$ alias b=date
   >    >     bash$ a
   >    >     b: commmand not found
   >    > [...]
   > 
   > Aliases are only expanded when they are in the position of a command
   > word, or if they follow an alias whose expansion ends in a space.
   > 
   > Brian

   I think alias expansion should be transitive.  In the above example,
   'a' should be expanded into 'date'.  In fact, that's what ksh does.  Is
   there any reason why this behavior is not desirable?

   Andy Wai

You keep using the word 'transitive' when in actuality you want aliases
to be expanded purely based on textual matches, irregardless of
location.

Am I making a correct assumption?

Brian