Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!gatech!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!APPLE.COM!nli!jym
From: nli!jym@APPLE.COM
Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss
Subject: Copywrongs
Message-ID: <8908211741.AA18320@nlp9>
Date: 21 Aug 89 17:41:19 GMT
Sender: bob@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu
Reply-To: gnu-misc-discuss@cis.ohio-state.edu
Distribution: gnu
Organization: Natural Languages, Inc.
Lines: 17

If you're intending this for wider publication, I'd suggest dropping the
 capitalistic/communistic adjectives.  For one thing, the terms are too
  vague to represent the meanings you seem to attach to them.  For another,
   the distinctions made are a bit oversimplified.

The fact is, while profit-driven competition is a dynamic system that can
 yield innovation, it's not the only system to do so.  The thesis that
  matter and energy pellet production is inherently capitalistic ignores
   other successful paradigms.

For more information, check out how Japan and (especially) Sweden operate.
::::.-----.:::::<_Jym_>:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
:::/   |   \::::.-----.:::::::::::::::: Jym Dyer :::::::::::::::::
::/    |    \::/  o o  \::::::::::::: jym@nli.com ::::::::::::::::
::\   /|\   /::\ \___/ /::::::::: Natural Languages, Inc. ::::::::
:::\ / | \ /::::`-----':::::::::: Berserkeley, California ::::::::
::::`-----':::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::