Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cica!gatech!eedsp!baud
From: baud@eedsp.gatech.edu (Kurt Baudendistel)
Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss
Subject: Re: Query: Status of Mach cleanout?
Message-ID: <407@eedsp.gatech.edu>
Date: 23 Aug 89 12:44:18 GMT
References: <12720001@eecs.nwu.edu> <1311000001@upba> <9056@uw-june.cs.washington.edu>
Reply-To: baud@eedsp.UUCP (Kurt Baudendistel)
Organization: Georgia Institute of Technology
Lines: 15

In article <9056@uw-june.cs.washington.edu> pardo@june.cs.washington.edu (David Keppel) writes:

>...  A program that uses part of gcc (for
>example is linked with the compiler) *is* derived from gcc and IF it
>is distributed at all, it must be freely distributable.  A program
>that is distributed *linked* with the GNU runtime libraries must be
>freely distributable.  

Please define ``freely'' as used in this paragraph.


-- 
Kurt Baudendistel --- GRA
Georgia Tech, School of Electrical Engineering, Atlanta, GA  30332
internet: baud@eedsp.gatech.edu         uucp: gatech!gt-eedsp!baud