Xref: utzoo news.groups:11787 news.admin:6622 Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ukma!uflorida!haven!uvaarpa!randall From: randall@uvaarpa.virginia.edu (Randall Atkinson) Newsgroups: news.groups,news.admin Subject: Re: SRH (soc.rights.human) is up, but with problems Message-ID: <578@uvaarpa.virginia.edu> Date: 25 Aug 89 12:39:30 GMT References: <19391@usc.edu> <19433@usc.edu> Reply-To: randall@uvaarpa.Virginia.EDU (Randall Atkinson) Followup-To: news.admin Organization: GE-Fanuc North America Lines: 18 In article <19433@usc.edu> kriz@skat.usc.edu (Dennis Kriz) writes: ( other stuff was deleted here) >In all this I obviously respect the right of system administrators to reject >any group, but if the group does in fact pass, then it should at least be >created. Greg Woods has no obligation to anyone to issue any newgroup just as no system is obliged to carry any group. What is silly is that Dennis Kriz was told before the vote that people wouldn't object to creating TALK.rights.human but objected strenuously to creating SOC.rights.human and that now he is surprised that many sites (apparently including some former "backbone" sites) aren't carrying the group. Please note that I have nothing to do with administration here on uvaarpa or at The Univeristy of Virginia for that matter. I speak for myself.