Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cornell!rochester!udel!mvac23!thomas
From: thomas@mvac23.UUCP (Thomas Lapp)
Newsgroups: news.newusers.questions
Subject: Re: Signature files (LONG)
Message-ID: <74.UUL1.3#5131@mvac23.UUCP>
Date: 20 Aug 89 23:28:53 GMT
References: <940@mtxinu.UUCP>
Reply-To: mvac23!thomas@udel.edu
Organization: MultiVac23, Newark, DE, U.S.A.
Lines: 21

> >Location: Newark, DE, USA                            |
> [my longish signature deleted]
> 
> Those who give advice about network addressing really ought to take care
> that the addresses with which they insist on littering up their .signature
> files are correct.  Note that the second address, had it been correct,
> would not have added information anyway.  Also note that the quote, the
> lines of "=", and the obscene number of blanks don't help anyone get
> mail to you.

Guess I got chastised on that one.  Right then.  How is the one below?
Better?
PS: Funny how I've been using the long signature (with the "incorrect")
    address for weeks now and until I post a message about .sigs, no one
    bothers to be a nice guy and politely correct me.
                         - tom

Internet: mvac23!thomas@udel.edu  
uucp    : {ucbvax,mcvax,psuvax1,uunet}!udel!mvac23!thomas
Location: Newark, DE, USA                          
Quote   : NOTICE: System will have a scheduled disk crash at 4:45pm today.