Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!texbell!vector!telecom-gateway From: esegue!johnl@uunet.uu.net (John R. Levine) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom Subject: Re: BOCs and Regionals Message-ID: Date: 30 Aug 89 15:43:48 GMT Sender: news@vector.Dallas.TX.US Reply-To: John Levine Organization: Segue Software, Cambridge MA Lines: 19 Approved: telecom-request@vector.dallas.tx.us X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@vector.dallas.tx.us X-TELECOM-Digest: volume 9, issue 337, message 7 of 12 In article nvuxr!deej@bellcore. bellcore.com (David Lewis) writes: >> NYNEX >> New England Telephone (Maine, NH, VT, Mass, RI) >> New York Telephone > >Note also that part of Conneticut is service by New England Tel. New York Tel provides service in Greenwich CT, which is next to the New York state line. New England Tel, as far as I can tell, serves the other four New England states but not Connecticut. On a somewhat related topic, is there any state that is entirely served by BOCs with no area given to independents? The only possibility I can think of is Delaware. Washington DC doesn't count, it's not a state. -- John R. Levine, Segue Software, POB 349, Cambridge MA 02238, +1 617 492 3869 {ima|lotus}!esegue!johnl, johnl@ima.isc.com, Levine@YALE.something Massachusetts has 64 licensed drivers who are over 100 years old. -The Globe