Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ames!sun-barr!texsun!texbell!vector!telecom-gateway From: jay@hermix.UUCP (Jay Skeer) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom Subject: Re: Plantronics LiteSet Message-ID: Date: 2 Sep 89 06:02:00 GMT Sender: news@vector.Dallas.TX.US Organization: Mark V Systems, Ltd., Encino, Ca. Lines: 22 Approved: telecom-request@vector.dallas.tx.us X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@vector.dallas.tx.us X-TELECOM-Digest: volume 9, issue 343, message 4 of 7 In-reply-to: claris!netcom!onymouse@ames.arc.nasa.gov's message of 31 Aug 89 08:31:57 GMT John said: >... [about a cordless telephone j'] ... I increased the range by >taking a meter of wire wrap wire and clipping it about one fourth ofthe way >up the fully extended antenna from the base. John, your antenna extension is a (technically) good idea (and you may want to check the actual circuit used in the base to determine ideal lengths of wire). However your improved antenna may be illegal. The FCC allows unlicensed use of certain low power radio frequency devices on certain frequencies. However the FCC often places restrictions on the antenna length and or height (usually they want your antenna to be shorter than some reference length, and lower than a certain reference height). Your antenna may also allow your neighbors to listen in, or even dial out. Thanks for the product review. j'