Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!csd4.csd.uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!rutgers!sun-barr!texsun!texbell!vector!telecom-gateway
From: benson@odi.com (Benson I. Margulies)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Re: TELECOM Digest V9 #347
Message-ID: <telecom-v09i0348m10@vector.dallas.tx.us>
Date: 5 Sep 89 12:57:59 GMT
Sender: news@vector.Dallas.TX.US
Lines: 16
Approved: telecom-request@vector.dallas.tx.us
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@vector.dallas.tx.us
X-TELECOM-Digest: volume 9, issue 348, message 10 of 10

Does Mr. Bulmash really want 100 phone calls from TELECOM readers? Isn't that
somewhat inconsistent with his philosophy? How about posting an Postal
Address?

[Moderator's Note: Good point. But apparently he does not mind getting the
calls. Not having any of his literature at hand, I tried the CNA for his
number:

(optr) "Name and address, may I help you?"
(me)   "393-1555"
(optr) "That's listed to 'Private Citizen, Inc', Warrenville, IL. At the
       customer's request, the address is not in our records."

I must presume he prefers phone calls of inquiry. He does not have an
answering machine on the line; at least not when I tried it just now. Anyway,
you're not trying to sell him anything -- he wants to sell you!! PT]