Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!apple!sun-barr!texsun!texbell!vector!telecom-gateway From: nvuxr!deej@bellcore.bellcore.com (David Lewis) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom Subject: Re: BOCs and Regionals Message-ID: Date: 5 Sep 89 13:11:58 GMT Sender: news@vector.Dallas.TX.US Organization: Bellcore, Livingston, NJ Lines: 29 Approved: telecom-request@vector.dallas.tx.us X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@vector.dallas.tx.us X-TELECOM-Digest: volume 9, issue 352, message 7 of 7 In article , esegue!johnl@uunet.uu. net (John R. Levine) writes: > In article nvuxr!deej@bellcore. > bellcore.com (David Lewis) writes: > >Note also that part of Conneticut is service by New England Tel. > > New York Tel provides service in Greenwich CT, which is next to the New York > state line. New England Tel, as far as I can tell, serves the other four > New England states but not Connecticut. Oh, well, my diagram is wrong. Shoulda trusted the LATA maps, not the stupid PR stuff. While we're picking nits, there are five other New England states... > On a somewhat related topic, is there any state that is entirely served by > BOCs with no area given to independents? The only possibility I can think > of is Delaware. Washington DC doesn't count, it's not a state. Give that man a half a cigar. Delaware is entirely served by Diamond State Tel. Rhode Island (must be the other New England state he forgot about ;-)) is entirely served by New England Tel. Both of these according to the LATA maps in Notes on the BOC Intra-LATA Networks, which are three years old. -- David G Lewis ...!bellcore!nvuxr!deej "If this is paradise, I wish I had a lawnmower."