Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!apple!oliveb!tymix!cirrusl!sun505!dhesi
From: dhesi@sun505.UUCP (Rahul Dhesi)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: pointers to functions
Message-ID: <835@cirrusl.UUCP>
Date: 2 Sep 89 00:54:05 GMT
References: <1679@hydra.gatech.EDU> <14499@haddock.ima.isc.com>
Sender: news@cirrusl.UUCP
Reply-To: dhesi%cirrusl@oliveb.ATC.olivetti.com (Rahul Dhesi)
Organization: Cirrus Logic Inc.
Lines: 11


     "Is the following code portable and why or why not?"

Alas!  Invariably when a question like this is asked, people tend to
answer as if the question had really been "is the following code
ANSI-conformant.."   Not that this is necessarily being done in the
reference article, but that it happens so commonly in comp.lang.c that
I thought I would point this out before it begins hapening again.
--
Rahul Dhesi <cirrusl!dhesi@oliveb.ATC.olivetti.com>
UUCP:  oliveb!cirrusl!dhesi